ISSN: 1301-2193 E-ISSN: 1308-9846
  • Turkish Journal of
    Endocrinology and Metabolism

Peer-Review

Turkish Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism is an independent international journal based on double-blind peer-review principles.

Editorial policies of the journal are conducted according to the rules advised by Council of Science Editors and reflected in the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals: Writing and Editing for Biomedical Publication (http://www.icmje.org/).

All manuscripts are reviewed by the editor, section associate editors and at least three internal and external expert referees. All research articles undergo review by statistical editor as well.

Submitted manuscripts are also subjected for the evaluation of plagiarism, duplicate publication by automatic software. Authors are obliged to acknowledge if they published study results in full or in part in form of abstracts.

The authors of the accepted manuscripts should be in consent that the editor and associate editors could make corrections without changing the main text of the paper. Manuscript format should be in accordance with Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals: Writing and Editing for Biomedical Publication (http://www.icmje.org/).

In Turkish Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism, the evaluation process of a manuscript is as follows:

Manuscript first arrival assessment (Duration 1 working day): The manuscript service checks the forms submitted by the authors and if something is missing or an error is found, they demand for the missing information. Edited or whole manuscript is presented to the associate editors for preliminary evaluation within one working day.

Associate Editors Evaluation (Duration 5 working days): The associate editors preliminarily review the manuscript and decide whether it should be taken into consideration for the journal. The associate editors appoint two referees from among the members of the arbitration committee who have the work related to the branch of the manuscript, provided that the authors do not serve in the same institution on the manuscripts decided to be evaluated. In order to ensure authorship and referee privacy, all personal and communication information of the author or everything describing the authors of the manuscript are closed by editing service for review by the double-blind method. The blind copies prepared for the referees are sent to them by the editing services.

Referee Evaluation (Duration 10 days): Referees should evaluate the manuscripts within 10 days. If the referee does not report any response within the time limit, their role on manuscript is terminated. If at least one of the referees' opinions is negative, the manuscript may be sent to a third independent referee.

After evaluation responses from the referees; the manuscript may be rejected, accepted or editing is required. 

Statistical Assessment (Duration 10 days): Positively replied original research articles, are sent to the statistical consultant assigned by the associate editor.

According to the evaluation responses from referees and, if available, from statistical consultant; the manuscript may be rejected or accepted by the editor or it is requested from the author to make corrections on it.

Author Correction (Duration 25 days): Associate editor’s, referee’s and, if available, statistical consultant’s comments are forwarded to the responsible/correspondence author of the article. When corrections are made on the manuscript, the corrected or added fields must be colored and marked in the file. Authors should answer editorial and referee criticisms, as well as report corrections made in manuscripts. The articles must be corrected within 25 days and sent back to the manuscript service. The manuscripts that are not responsed within the correction period or whose justification is not requested for an additional period of time will be terminated.

Associate Editors Final Assessment (Duration 5 working days): Manuscripstsbcoming from the associate editors for the decision after the corrections; if the referees indicate that they wish to see the corrections, will be sent back to the referees in the final version. In other cases, the editor may wish to re-evaluate the final version of the manuscript, specify a new referee or reject or accept the manuscript.

Informing the Authors about the Evaluation Results (Duration 1 working day): As a result of the scientific evaluation, the authors are notified by e-mail if manuscripts are accepted or rejected for publication in the editorial decision.

For the rejected manuscripts; justification of the editorial decision and, if there are any, final comments from referees, are sent to all authors via personal automation pages.

Ethic

For the experimental, clinical and drug human studies, approval by ethical committee and statement on the adherence of the study protocol to the international agreements (Helsinki Declaration revised 2013 https://www.wma.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/DoH-Oct2013-JAMA.pdf) are required. In experimental animal studies, the authors should indicate that the procedures followed were in accordance with animal rights (Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals, www.nap.edu/read/12910/chapter/1) and they should obtain animal ethic committee approval. The Ethic Committee approval document should be submitted to the Turkish Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism together with the manuscript.

The approval of the ethic committee, statement on the adherence to international guidelines mentioned above and that the patients` informed consent is obtained should be indicated in the `Material and Method` section and is required for case reports whenever data/media used could reveal identity of the patient. The declaration of the conflict of interest between authors, institutions, acknowledgement of any financial or material support, aid is mandatory for authors submitting manuscript and the statement should appear at the end of manuscript. Reviewers are required to report if any potential conflict of interest exists between reviewer and authors, institutions.

We use "iThenticate" to screen all submissions for plagiarism before publication.

Plagiarism: To re-publish whole or in part the contents of another author's publication as one's own without providing a reference.

Fabrication: To publish data and findings/results that do not exist.

Duplication: Use of data from another publication, which includes re-publishing a manuscript in different languages without citing.

Salamisation: To create more than one publication by dividing the results of a study preternaturally.

We disapproval upon such unethical practices as plagiarism, fabrication, duplication, and salamisation, as well as efforts to influence the review process with such practices as gifting authorship, inappropriate acknowledgements, and references. Additionally, authors must respect participant right to privacy. On the other hand, short abstracts published in congress books that do not exceed 400 words and present data of preliminary research, and those that are presented in an electronic environment are not accepted pre-published work.

Authors in such situation must declare this status on the first page of the manuscript and in the cover letter. (The COPE flowchart is available at:

https://publicationethics.org/files/Full%20set%20of%20English%20flowcharts_9Nov2016.pdf)