ISSN: 1301-2193 E-ISSN: 1308-9846
  • Turkish Journal of
    Endocrinology and Metabolism

Introduction

Thyroid cancer constitutes about 90% of endocrine system cancers, 1% of all cancers and 0.2% of cancer-related mortality, worldwide (1). Today, the number of operations for suspected malignancy but with a benign pathological result is increasing. Although fine needle aspiration (FNA) has a high sensitivity and specificity, high frequency of false-negative and inconclusive results cause unnecessary operations. One of the explanations for false negative results is incidental microcarcinomas. In a study by Gul K. at al., 83 of 224 (37%) patients with thyroid cancer were diagnosed incidentally (2). For this reason, additional preoperative markers are needed to increase the sensitivity of cytology for evaluating the preoperative malignancy risk of thyroid nodules. Differentiated thyroid cancers (DTC) express thyroid stimulant hormone (TSH) receptors and give response to TSH stimulation by this way (3). In addition, it is well known that TSH suppression treatment improves disease-free survival in high-risk patients with DTC (4). Recently, it has been reported that there is a relationship between TSH levels and DTC in patients with nodular thyroid diseases, and also, higher TSH values, despite within normal range, are associated with more advanced stage of DTC (5). The aim of this study was to evaluate diagnostic value of preoperative serum TSH concentrations for DTC in patients without overt hypo- or hyperthyroidism, and presence of a proper diagnostic cut-off value if a relevant association was found.

Materials and Methods
Patient Recruitment

Data of patients, who underwent total thyroidectomy or near total thyroidectomy for Graves’ disease, nodulary or multinodulary goiter in Ankara Numune Education and Research Hospital between January 1, 2012 and June 1, 2013, were collected retrospectively. Patients who had undergone completion thyroidectomy and who were previously treated with radioiodine ablation were excluded from the study. Patients who used levothyroxine or antithyroid drugs, and diagnosed with poorly differentiated tumors or medullary thyroid cancer were also excluded. Patients with subclinical hypothyroidism or hyperthyroidism were included according to free thyroksin, free iodothyronin and TSH levels. But patients with overt hypothyroidism or overt hyperthyroidism were excluded. Results of remaining 201 patients who were found to have differentiated thyroid carcinoma (185 (92%) were with papillary thyroid carcinoma, 16 (8%) were with folliculary thyroid carcinoma) were included as study group (group 1), and 179 consecutive patients with benign pathology results and meeting inclusion criteria were included as control group (group 2). Demographic characteristics of the patients (age, sex), histopathological characteristics of the tumor (dimensions, multifocality, bilaterality, extrathyroidal involvement, capsulary invasion, vasculary invasion and presence of cervical lymph node metastasis), and preoperative levels of serum TSH were analyzed.
Laboratory Analyses
Laboratory analyses of TSH, fT3 and fT4 were performed by using Access HYPERsensitive human TSH, Access FT3 and Access FT4 assays, respectively, and by chemiluminescence method (Roche Diagnostics). Normal reference values for thyroid function tests were 0.34-4.25 μIU/ml, 2.5-3.9 pg/ml, and 0.61-1.2 pg/ml for TSH, fT3, and fT4, respectively

Statistical Analyses

SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) for Windows 18.0 was used for statistical analyses of the data in this study. Normal distribution of the continuous data was tested by the Shapiro-Wilk test. Normally distributed continuous data were presented as mean ± standart deviations, non-normally distributed continuous data were presented as median (minimum-maximum), and categorical variables were presented as number of cases and (%). Significance of the difference of means were analyzed by the Student’s t test, and significance of the difference of medians were analyzed by the Mann-Whitney U test between groups. Significance of the difference of categorical variables were analyzed by either Pearson’s Chi-Square or Fisher’s Exact Chi-Square tests. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated for normally distributed variables. Significance level was accepted as 0.05, significant difference was called when p<0.05, and non-significant difference was called when p>0.05.

Ethical Committee Approval

Local Ethics Committee of Ankara Numune Education and Research Hospital approved this study with 635/2013-approval number.

Results

This study included data of 380 patients (319 females, 61 males) with a mean age of 46.7 (16-77) years. There were no significant differences between groups 1 and 2 for age, sex and mean TSH levels (Table 1). The mean tumor size was 11.8±11.2 mm (1-94) in patients with DTC. One-hundred and eight of patients had microcarcinoma (53.7%), and 93 of them had tumors over 10 mm in diameter (46.3%). There was no significant difference in distribution of patients with DTC between the age groups (p=0.061).
There was no correlation between TSH and tumor size (r=-0.072, p=0.310, Figure 1). Also no significant difference was found between TSH levels and groups according to the tumor dimensions (<5 mm, 5-10 mm, >10 mm) or micro- and macrocarcinomas (Table 2).
No significant differences was found between TSH levels of DTC patients with and without multifocality, capsulary invasion, vasculary invasion, extrathyroidal extension and lymph node metastasis (Table 3). Distant metastasis was found in none of the patients.
Subclinical hypothyroidism detected in 26 patients (14 patients were in group 1, 12 were in group 2) and subclinical hyperthyroidism detected in 75 patients (40 patients were in group 1, 35 were in group 2). Of this 75 patients, 52 were due to toxic multinodulary goiter and 23 were toxic diffuse goiter. DTC prevalence was not significantly different when grouped according to the TSH levels as subclinical hyperthyroidism (TSH range 0.01-0.4), euthyroidism (TSH range 0.4-4.4) and subclinical hypothyroidism (TSH range 4.5-9.6) (Figure 2). DTC/control ratio was 53.3%, 52.4% and 53.8% respectively (p=0.914). In our study, the association between TSH level and final histology remained nonsignificant after patients with subclinical hypo- and hyperthyroidism were excluded (p=0,256).

Discussion

Growth of thyroid gland is primarily provided by TSH, growth factors and some cytokines. Differentiated thyroid cancers express TSH receptors and give response to TSH stimulation by this way (3). It was shown in animal models that TSH may lead to thyroid cancer, but it was not proved that it is the main factor for thyroid cancers in humans (6). First study that showed the relationship between thyroid cancers and TSH levels was published in 2006 by Boalert et al. (7). Higher TSH levels were shown to be related with thyroid malignancy (risk of thyroid cancer in group with TSH levels lower than 0.4 mIU/lt was 2.4%, and 29.6% in group with TSH levels between 1.8 to 5.5, p<0.001). One of the limitations of this study is that classification was based on FNA biopsy results. The other limitation was that patients on levothyroksin or antithyroid drugs were not excluded. In 2012, Mcleod et al. published a meta-analysis including 22 studies, 5605 cancer cases and 40.929 controls. According to the results of this study thyroid cancer risk was two times higher in patients with TSH levels of 4 mIU/lt when compared to patients with TSH levels of 0.65 mIU/lt. The authors suggested that this relationship may help the clinicians for FNA indication in cases with upper-normal or high TSH levels (8). Some previous studies also reported that there was no correlation between TSH levels and DTC frequency and poor prognostic factors (9,10,11). One of the largest studies that evaluated the relationship between thyroid cancers and TSH histopathologically was conducted by Kim et al., no correlation was found between TSH and thyroid cancer similarly to our study. In a study by Megan et al. in 2009 (12), a significant relationship was found between TSH and thyroid cancer, but no association was found between aggressive behavior of thyroid cancer and TSH, like our study. More recently, Sohn Y et al. reported no significant associations between serum TSH level and the risk of malignancy in patients with papillary microcarcinomas. However, there was a significant association between serum TSH level and malignancy risk in patients with papillary macrocarcinomas (13). Although there is some convincing evidence to support the relationship between TSH and DTC, on the other hand, there are some data against a role for TSH in the development or progression of thyroid cancers. First, suppression of serum TSH by exogenous thyroid hormone have no significant clinical benefit in patients with low-risk thyroid cancer (14). Second, there is no evidence for a direct oncogenic role of TSH in human thyroid carcinogenesis (15). Third, it was shown that other growth factors such as insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) are more potent in stimulating thyroid cancer growth (16). Fourth, there is an inverse relationship between TSH receptor mRNA levels and aggressive features of cancer (17). Finally, these findings suggest that TSH receptor stimulation via increased levels of TSH may play a role in the growth of benign and malignant thyroid tumors (18,19).

Limitations and strength

The strength of our study was that we had a large number of DTC cases (n=201), our patients did not use any medication which could affect thyroid function tests and our examination was based on thyroid surgery instead of FNA. We also have some limitations in this study. Since our study is a retrospective cross-sectional study, the data on preoperative ultrasound imaging and FNA biopsy results were not proper for evaluation, because of missed and non-standardized data.

Conclusion

There is growing data about relationship between TSH and thyroid cancer. Despite this growing data, still there is some controversy on this topic. Whether this possible relationship between TSH and thyroid cancers is an actual pathogenetic factor, or a contributing factor to pre-existing tumor progression is still a matter of debate, and a cut-off value for TSH to predict malignancy is unknown. This was the first study to evaluate the relationship between TSH and differentiated thyroid cancer in Turkish population without overt thyroid dysfunction.

Conflict of Interests

Authors declare no conflict of interests.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sector.

References

1. Jemal A, Murray T, Ward E, et al. American Cancer Society. Cancer Statistics, CA Cancer J Clin 2005; 55:10–30.
2. Gul K, Özdemir D, Ersoy D, Aydın C, Erkan A, Ersoy PE, Aydın, et al. Comparison of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma and carcinoma. Turk Jem, 2009, 13: 47-51
3. Jameson J.L, Weetman A.P= Thyroid Cancer. ‘Harrison’s Principles of İnternal Medicine, Editors: E.Braunwald, A.S Fauci. D.L.Kasper, S.L.Hauser, D.L.Longo, J.L.Jameson, 2, 15. Edition. 2001, 2079-2083.
4. Rago T, Fiore E, Scutari M, Santini F, Di Coscio G, Romani R, et al. Male sex, single nodularity, and young age are associated with the risk of finding a papillary thyroid cancer on fine-needle aspiration cytology in a large series of patients with nodular thyroid disease. Eur J Endocrinol, 2010,162:763–770
5. Jonklaas J, Sarlis NJ, Litofsky D, Ain KB, Bigos ST, Brierley JD, et al. Outcomes of patients with differentiated thyroid carcinoma following initial therapy. Thyroid, 2006 16:1229–1242
6. Schneider A.B, Ron E. Carcinoma of Follicular epithelium: Werner and Ingbar’s the Thyroid, Editors: L.E.Braverman, R.D Utiger, 8. Edition 2000, 878-886.
7. Boelaert, K., Horacek, J., Holder, R.L. et al. Serum thyrotropin concentration as a novel predictor of malignancy in thyroid nodules investigated by fine-needle aspiration. Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism, 2006. 91, 4295–4301.
8. McLeod et al. TSH and Thyroid Cancer. J Clin Endocrinol Metab, August 2012, 97(8): 2682–2692
9. Kim KW, Park YJ, Kim EH, Park SY, Park do J, Ahn SH, et al. Elevated risk of papillary thyroid cancer in Korean patients with Hashimoto’s thyroiditis. Head Neck, 2011. 33: 691–695
10. Roberto Negro at al. Thyrotropin values in patients with micropapillary thyroid cancer versus benign nodular disease, Endocrine Practice, 2013. 19, 4, 651
11. Hyun Sook Kim, Seung Joon Lee, Jung Kyu Park, Chang Ho Jo, Ho Sang Shon, Eui Dal Jung. Association between serum thyroid stimulating hormone level and papillary thyroid microcarcinoma in Korean euthyroid patients. Endocrinol Metab. 2011 Dec;26(4) : 297-302.
12. Megan R. Haymart, Simone L. Glinberg. Higher serum TSH in thyroid cancer patients occurs independent of age and correlates with extrathyroidal extension. Clinical Endocrinology, 2009. 71, 434–439.
13. Sohn SY, Kim HJ, Jang HW, Kim SW, Chung JH. Lack of association between high serum thyroid-stimulating hormone level and risk of papillary thyroid microcarcinomas. Head Neck. 2014 Jan;36(1):43-6.
14. Biondi B, Filetti S, Schlumberger M. Thyroid-hormone therapy and thyroid cancer: a reassessment. Nat Clin Pract Endocrinol Metab 2005;1:32–40.
15. Yeager N, Klein-Szanto A, Kimura S. Pten loss in the mouse thyroid causes goiter and follicular adenomas: insights into thyroid function and Cowden disease pathogenesis. Cancer Research. 2007. 67 959–966.
16. Shi Y, Zou M & Farid NR. Expression of thyrotrophin receptor gene in thyroid carcinoma is associated with a good prognosis. Clinical Endocrinology. 1993. 39 269–274.
17. Satta MA, De RG, Testa A, Maussier ML, Valenza V, Rabitti C, et al. Thyroid cancer in suppressed contralateral lobe of patients with hot thyroid nodule. European Journal of Cancer 1993 29A 1190–1192.
18. Brabant G. Thyrotropin suppressive therapy in thyroid carcinoma: what are the targets? Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2008. 93 1167–1169.
19. Boelaert K. The association between serum TSH concentration and thyroid cancer. Endocrine-Related Cancer. 2009. 16 1065–1072